Bill withdrawn from JS in light of HC verdict on arrest of public servants

The Public Service (Amendment) Bill, 2022 was withdrawn from Parliament on Monday.

 

State Minister for Public Administration Farhad Hossain moved the withdrawal motion. It was later passed by voice vote.

 

The state minister, however, did not say anything regarding his move to withdraw it.

 

Read more: Bill to replace law of military regimes placed in JS

 

The Bill was placed in the House on August 29 inducting a clause to shield public servants from unnecessary harassment. The treasury benches contend such a provision exists in the law in many countries across the globe, including India.

 

But today’s withdrawal may have been affected by a High Court ruling that police would not require prior permission to arrest government officials in criminal cases.

 

The state minister said that the government will appeal the August 25 decision of the High Court, that struck down a provision in the 2018 Public Service Act preventing police from arresting a government official without permission from higher authorities, even in criminal cases.

 

The HC ruling came from the bench of justices Md Mozibur Rahman Miah and Kazi Md Ejarul Haque Akondo. The bench described the 2018 provision as “unconstitutional”.

 

Read more: Govt to appeal HC ruling on scrapping prior permission to arrest officials in criminal case

 

“A section has been given special facilities by enacting the provision of getting prior permission to arrest government employees, which is sheer discrimination and violence of articles 26, 27 and 31 of the Constitution,” the bench said.

 

On November 14, 2018, a gazette was issued on Public Service Act, 2018. It was published on September 26, 2019, and came into effect on October 1, 2019.

 

According to Section 41(1) of the Act, prior permission is needed from the government or higher authorities to arrest a government officer for a criminal offence.

 

On October 14, 2019, a writ petition was filed challenging the legality of Section 41 (1) of the Act.

 

Advocates Sarwar Ahad Chowdhury, Eklas Uddin Bhuiya and Mahbubul Islam filed the writ petition on behalf of Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh, an NGO.

 

On October 21, 2019, the High Court issued a rule asking the government to explain as to why Section 41 (1) of the Public Service Act should not be declared “illegal and contradictory to articles 26(1) and (2), 27 and 31 of the Constitution.”

 

Source: United News of Bangladesh