Dhaka: Prime Minister’s Adviser on Information and Broadcasting, Dr. Zahed Ur Rahman, clarified on Tuesday that merely supporting or speaking in favor of the deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina cannot be considered a criminal act unless a specific law is enacted to criminalize such conduct. Dr. Zahed addressed these concerns while responding to journalists’ questions during a press briefing at the Secretariat, focusing on the progress of various government activities.
According to United News of Bangladesh, Dr. Zahed emphasized that individuals cannot be deemed criminals solely based on allegations. Legal action must be governed by existing laws. When queried about allegations against journalists allegedly aiding Sheikh Hasina in crimes against humanity, Dr. Zahed stated that those with substantial evidence of involvement in such crimes are being prosecuted at the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT). He reiterated that a law is necessary to consider supporting Sheikh Hasina as a criminal act.
Dr. Zahed highlighted the importance of legislation, stating, ‘Until something is criminalized, criminal charges cannot be brought against anyone.’ He acknowledged allegations against Sheikh Hasina’s government regarding a lack of justice and misuse of existing laws, emphasizing the need to prevent injustice under both the current and future democratic governments.
On the subject of alleged secret meetings or conspiracies involving journalists, Dr. Zahed remarked that it is the responsibility of intelligence agencies to investigate any activities potentially jeopardizing state security. He assured that relevant agencies would take necessary action if required.
Addressing calls for a distinct law to protect journalists following attacks, Dr. Zahed noted that existing laws already allow for stringent action against such offenses. While a new law could be considered, he cautioned that its introduction alone would not guarantee journalists’ safety. Ongoing legal proceedings for attacks on journalists should continue under current laws.
Regarding the inclusion of cultural activists’ names in ICT cases, Dr. Zahed urged caution, stating that speculation is inappropriate during ongoing investigations. He mentioned that the chief prosecutor had preliminary information about a cultural activist’s involvement but stressed that names should not be disclosed until formal charges are filed. Dr. Zahed warned against sensationalism and emphasized the importance of verifying allegations through investigation before public disclosure.